It ‘s “Do not allow the tyranny of the market.”?? – Wasting time?

Do not allow the tyranny of the market! Market fundamentalist Me! The government should address the issue of more gap!

Claim that is often.Is not that it was only in Japan anything, at the insistence seen all over the world in the United States even (!) United Kingdom This.It probably has spoken based on the recognition of the role that the market becomes larger and larger.But I wonder if I really correct it?

Today, from the blog, adam smith institute.

Do we have a capitalist economy?
We could quite easily ask the protestors whether they thought an economy in which circa 50% of GDP is spent by the government could reasonably defined as capitalist? Where 20% of workers are government employees and almost everyone in the economy is in receipt of state transfer payments or other forms of state aid is ‘free market’? Where the top rate of income tax is 50%? Where government debt is 392% of GDP? Where the remaining 50% of the ‘free market’ economy is heavily regulated by the multitude of statutes and statutory bodies across every sector? This is the story of Britain, to summarize briefly

50% of GDP is due to government spending.20% of workers are employed by the government.And, everyone is receiving income transfers from the government almost.Top rate of income tax’s 50 percent.Part of the economy that does not depend on the government spending of the remaining 50% have also been regulated in various forms (number of accumulated debt of the government would be a mistake)

What about?

Of course, the scale is smaller, such as fiscal spending by the government in the case of Japan.It is nevertheless.Involvement in the market by the government is less in such a state.Claims should not allow the tyranny of the market I wonder should get the legitimacy really?

Rather, I wonder not say excessive involvement in the market by the government is to inhibit the functioning of markets, and has created poverty or creating a wave of economic?
. The vast level of government interventions have resulted in a pseudo-capitalist system based on corporatism, not free markets Under this system large institutions such as trade unions, large corporations, professional associations and so forth have a symbiotic relationship with big government – they strong ties with organizations such as labor unions and large corporations. government are both dependent upon each other to protect their positions of privilege all at the expense of non-members and consumers ie society at large is not based on the free market of the true I have created a capitalism

Exactly, it might be correct.

Wave of opposition movement of anti-(large) companies ism that Occupy wall street is as spread.From the desire to the anti-market principles, some people might have supported the movement such.However, it is that the power of government is too strong we can be a problem.Then, it is that you are trying to achieve a beneficial policy of their government too strong in collusion with large companies such as.

Intervention in the market by the monetary policy and fiscal stimulus of government also vigorous vibration of the economy.Aspect that has been brought about by the policy the wrong policy and central bank Lehman shock and the resulting housing bubble in the United States also bubble in Japan was also incorrect government very strong.

That things to prevent intervention in the market by the government, to establish a truly free market is the most important.The domineering It is not the market.It is a government, it is in the people in the entourage.

blog of wasting time? ↓
The Omou Japan while sending a lazy life in London